Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 11:51:53AM +0000, Prabhakar kirjoitti: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Replace the hardcoded `1000000000` with the predefined `NANO` macro for > clarity. Simplify the code by introducing a `ns_per_tick` variable to > store `NANO / rate`, reducing redundancy and improving readability. ... > - brl -= t->scl_fall_ns / (1000000000 / rate); > - brh -= t->scl_rise_ns / (1000000000 / rate); > + ns_per_tick = NANO / rate; So, why NANO and not NSEC_PER_SEC? > + brl -= t->scl_fall_ns / ns_per_tick; > + brh -= t->scl_rise_ns / ns_per_tick; -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
