Hi Heiner,
On Sat, Mar 04, 2023 at 10:36:34PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Here we don't have to write SMBHSTCNT in each iteration of the loop.
> Bit SMBHSTCNT_START is internally cleared immediately, therefore
> we don't have to touch the value of SMBHSTCNT until the last byte.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> index 7641bd0ac..e1350a8cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-i801.c
> @@ -677,11 +677,11 @@ static int i801_block_transaction_byte_by_byte(struct i801_priv *priv,
> for (i = 1; i <= len; i++) {
> if (i == len && read_write == I2C_SMBUS_READ)
> smbcmd |= SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE;
> - outb_p(smbcmd, SMBHSTCNT(priv));
>
> if (i == 1)
> - outb_p(inb(SMBHSTCNT(priv)) | SMBHSTCNT_START,
> - SMBHSTCNT(priv));
> + outb_p(smbcmd | SMBHSTCNT_START, SMBHSTCNT(priv));
> + else if (smbcmd & SMBHSTCNT_LAST_BYTE)
> + outb_p(smbcmd, SMBHSTCNT(priv));
Looks reasonable to me... Jean, any opinion here?
Andi
