> > In the DT world, we avoid snow flakes. Once you define a binding, it > > is expected every following board will use it. So what i believe you > > are doing here is defining how i2c muxes are described in APCI. > > Linux kernel has already established description of I2C muxes in ACPI: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/firmware-guide/acpi/i2c-muxes.html > > I'm not sure we want another one. Agreed. This implementation needs to make use of that. Thanks for pointing it out. I don't know the ACPI world, are there any other overlaps with existing ACPI bindings? Andrew
