On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 08:05:41 +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 26.08.2021 16:00, Jean Delvare wrote: > > If pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay() is not suitable for the task then > > maybe we need a better API. I will admit I'm at a loss when it comes to > > the many pm_runtime_* calls, I'm not going to claim I fully understand > > what each of them is doing exactly. But don't we want to simply call > > pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() here? > > > > If not and there's no suitable API for the task at the moment, then > > better do not apply this patch, and instead ask the PM subsystem > > maintainers if they would be willing to implement what we need. > > To follow-up on this: This patch has been applied already. Therefore, > if decision is to not go with it, it would need to be reverted. Technically it's not in Linus' tree yet ;-) I'm still interested to know if pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend() is the right call to use in this situation. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support
