On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 10:03:12PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > On 11.08.2021 17:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 11:12:18PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > >> Setting the autosuspend delay to a negative value disables runtime pm in > >> a little bit smarter way, because we need no cleanup when removing the > >> driver. Note that this is safe when reloading the driver, because the > >> call to pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay() in probe() will reverse the > >> effect. See update_autosuspend() for details. > > > > ... > > > >> * BIOS is accessing the host controller so prevent it from > >> * suspending automatically from now on. > >> */ > >> - pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev); > >> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&pdev->dev, -1); > > > > I dunno if it's being discussed, but with this you effectively allow user to > > override the setting. It may screw things up AFAIU the comment above. > > > No, this hasn't been discussed. At least not now. Thanks for the hint. > This attribute is writable for the root user, so we could argue that > the root user has several options to break the system anyway. But it will mean the side effect on this driver and typical (root-run) system application (systemd like?) should care now the knowledge about this side-effect. I do not think it is desired behaviour. But I'm not a maintainer and I commented here just to make everybody understand the consequences of the change. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko