> On 02/19/2021 1:01 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From a maintaining perspective, I think, though, we should have only one > master_xfer() function and use 'atomic_xfer' in there to skip stuff etc. > Otherwise fixes in one function might be forgotten in the other one. Or? My guesstimate is that the amount of code required is about the same for both approaches, but having two separate implementations makes both of them a lot more readable. CU Uli
