On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:01:56PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: [...] > It's still possible to add the clk-num checking, but it should be > unpractical. We could always add it later on if there will be a real > incident. Do you agree? There's also clk_bulk_get(), which allows you to specify the number of clocks and their consumer IDs that you want to request. That seems like it would allow us to both avoid the repetitive calls to clk APIs and at the same time allows us to specify exactly which clocks we need. Would that not work as a compromise? Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
