Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: aspeed: fix invalid clock parameters for very large divisors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 9/21/2018 3:10 PM, Brendan Higgins wrote:
The function that computes clock parameters from divisors did not
respect the maximum size of the bitfields that the parameters were
written to. This fixes the bug.

This bug can be reproduced with (and this fix verified with) the test
at: https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/1035/

Discovered-by-KUnit: https://kunit-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/+/1035/
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jae Hyun Yoo <jae.hyun.yoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  - v2 updates the title of the patch, renames a local variable, and
    prints an error when the clock divider is clamped.
---

[....]

+	if (base_clk_divisor > ASPEED_I2CD_TIME_BASE_DIVISOR_MASK) {
+		base_clk_divisor = ASPEED_I2CD_TIME_BASE_DIVISOR_MASK;
+		clk_low = clk_high_low_mask;
+		clk_high = clk_high_low_mask;
+		dev_err(dev,
+			"clamping clock divider: divider requested, %u, is greater than largest possible divider, %u.",

Please put a newline character at the end of the string.

Thanks,
Jae

[....]



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux