[PATCH] i2c: aspeed: use proper annotation for "fall through"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Use a better annotation, so GCC won't complain anymore:

drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c:458:15: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
index c258c4d9a4c0..8170201e4aa7 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-aspeed.c
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ static u32 aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status)
 			goto error_and_stop;
 		}
 		irq_handled |= ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_TX_ACK;
-		/* fallthrough intended */
+		/* fall through */
 	case ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_TX_FIRST:
 		if (bus->buf_index < msg->len) {
 			bus->master_state = ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_TX;
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static u32 aspeed_i2c_master_irq(struct aspeed_i2c_bus *bus, u32 irq_status)
 		/* RX may not have completed yet (only address cycle) */
 		if (!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE))
 			goto out_no_complete;
-		/* fallthrough intended */
+		/* fall through */
 	case ASPEED_I2C_MASTER_RX:
 		if (unlikely(!(irq_status & ASPEED_I2CD_INTR_RX_DONE))) {
 			dev_err(bus->dev, "master failed to RX\n");
-- 
2.18.0




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux