Hi,
On 09-08-18 11:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any
changes from it here.
Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series.
As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and
the other reviewers.
Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which
is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is
unrelated.
I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least
for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack).
As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take
patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86
tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and
merging them independently should not cause any issues.
I can apply the 4th one too if it is ACKed by everyone with a vested interest.
That works for me, note I'm about to send out a v6 (with only changes to
the 4th patch), so hold of a bit with merging this please.
Andy does your ack for the 4th patch mean you're ok with Rafael merging
this?
Regards,
Hans
