On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 09-08-18 11:51, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:39 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 09-08-18 11:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 11:15 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >> >> >>>> I've applied the v4 of this patch and I don't think there are any >>>> changes from it here. >>> >>> >>> >>> Correct, there were only changes to the 4th patch in the series. >>> >>>> As for the rest of the series I'll wait from comments from Wolfram and >>>> the other reviewers. >>> >>> >>> >>> Ok, note if you've taken patch 1 you may also want to take patch 3 which >>> is an ACPI code cleanup made possible by patch 1 and otherwise is >>> unrelated. >> >> >> I'm under impression Rafael is going to take entire series (at least >> for patch 4 I'm expecting to give an Ack). > > > As I mentioned in the coverletter, my idea was to have Rafael take > patches 1-3 and then merge the 4th patch through the platform/x86 > tree. There are only runtime dependencies between the 2 parts and > merging them independently should not cause any issues. I can apply the 4th one too if it is ACKed by everyone with a vested interest.
