Re: i2c i801 Host Notify breaks HP G3 850 booting while plugged in

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jason,

On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 11:18:02 -0400, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> I dumped the data before load, during (while loaded) and after unload.
> The ioports are all uninitialized 0xff before loading the module and
> do not revert at unload.  PCI config space also does not totally
> revert.
> 
> [root@localhost ~]# diff isadump.before isadump.during
> 2,3c2,3
> < efa0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> < efb0: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff

I guess the PCI device is not enabled at that point, so I/O resources
are not mapped.

> ---
> > efa0: 00 00 08 75 a7 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 1c 00 07 07
> > efb0: 00 01 00 00 58 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  
> [root@localhost ~]# diff isadump.during isadump.after
> 2c2
> < efa0: 00 00 08 75 a7 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 1c 00 07 07
> ---
> > efa0: 40 00 08 75 a7 00 00 00 00 44 00 00 1c 00 07 07  

Only difference is bit 6 of register 0x00, INUSE_STS. That's expected
and not specifically related to the Host Notify feature.

> [root@localhost ~]# diff lspci.before lspci.during
> 3c3
> < 00: 86 80 23 9d 00 00 88 02 21 00 05 0c 00 00 00 00
> ---
> > 00: 86 80 23 9d 03 00 80 02 21 00 05 0c 00 00 00 00  

Hmm. I expected differences in the device specific configuration
registers (0x40 and above.)

Bits 0 and 1 of PCI Command Register get set: I/O space enabled, memory
space enabled. This must be the result of pcim_enable_device().

Bit 11 of PCI Status Register gets cleared: Signaled Target Abort
(STA). No idea what this is all about, my datasheet says it should
always be 0.

> [root@localhost ~]# diff lspci.during lspci.after
> [root@localhost ~]# #No difference
> 
> The full session of commands is below.  I haven't analyzed any of
> these values since I am unfamiliar with them.
> 
> I hope this helps.

Not really, I'm afraid. I hopped for something more obviously related
to what you observe.

For clarity, were the tests above done with or without
disable_features=0x20? Does it make any difference if you change?

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux