2018-03-19 15:43 GMT+01:00 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:17 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This series contains what I hope to be a non-controversial refactoring
>> of the at24 eeprom driver.
>>
>> Most changes revolve around at24_probe() which became quite complicated
>> and hard to read.
>>
>> The only functional changes are: disabling the internal locking
>> mechanisms of regmap (since we already take care of that in the driver)
>> and removing an if checking if byte_len is a power of 2 (as we do
>> support models for which it's not true).
>>
>> All other patches affect readability and code structure.
>>
>> Tested with a couple models and different both for device tree and
>> platform data modes.
>
> Is there any available tree with that series applied?
> I would test it on Intel Galileo Gen 2 which has ACPI enumerated AT24
> EEPROM attached.
>
Yes, it's in my github tree:
https://github.com/brgl/linux topic/at24/refactoring
Thanks in advance for testing it!
Best regards,
Bartosz
