On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 08:15:04AM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote: > On 2018-02-26 21:42, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 08:49:18PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 01:45:15PM +0100, Romain Porte wrote: > >>> This new patchset mainly removes any references to 'risky' addresses, > >>> but uses the 'all' addresses instead. This reflects the name of the > >>> chosen '-a' option that is already present in i2cdetect. > >>> > >>> Changes from previous version: > >>> > >>> - Use 'all_addrs' name instead of 'risky_addr' > >>> - Remove 'risky' mentions in man pages > >>> - Remove 'risky' mentions in commits > >>> > >>> Please review. > >> > >> Well, I like the change and visually reviewed the code. From that: > >> > >> Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Hopefully, I'll have some time later to actually test the code and > >> upgrade to "Reviewed-by"... Peter seemed happy, too. However, I'd like > >> to get some response from Jean. > > > > Or let's try to offload stuff from Jean: Peter, if you'd have time to test > > this code and donate a tag, I can push it to the i2c-tools repo. > > I can offer a > > Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@xxxxxxxxxx> That's good already, thanks! Maybe someone else on the list has some time for testing. I'll try, too, but can't really say when...
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
