Re: Patch proposal for using all addresses in i2c-tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 02, 2018 at 01:45:15PM +0100, Romain Porte wrote:
> This new patchset mainly removes any references to 'risky' addresses,
> but uses the 'all' addresses instead. This reflects the name of the
> chosen '-a' option that is already present in i2cdetect.
> 
> Changes from previous version:
> 
>  - Use 'all_addrs' name instead of 'risky_addr'
>  - Remove 'risky' mentions in man pages
>  - Remove 'risky' mentions in commits
> 
> Please review.

Well, I like the change and visually reviewed the code. From that:

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hopefully, I'll have some time later to actually test the code and
upgrade to "Reviewed-by"... Peter seemed happy, too. However, I'd like
to get some response from Jean.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux