Re: [PATCH v2] i2c/ARM: davinci: Deep refactoring of I2C recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Alter the DaVinci GPIO recovery fetch to use descriptors
>>> all the way down into the board files.
>>>
>>> Cc: arm@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
>>> Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
>>> Acked-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
>>> Tested-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@xxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> ChangeLog v1->v2:
>>> - Change gpiochip name from gpio_davinci.0 to gpio_davinci, simply.
>>
>> This seems to clash with "i2c: davinci: Add PM Runtime Support", please
>> rebase on top of v4.15-rc and resend.
>
> Strange, where do you see this problem?
>
> I just applied the patch on top of Wolfram's for-next
> branch and it worked like a charm. It has the PM Runtime patch
> underneath and all.

I looked at v4.15-rc4, but haven't analyzed further.

        Arnd



[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux