Hi Andy,
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 14:11 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Thanks for the patch!
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 03:12:20PM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
>> > This patch supports xgene-slimpro-i2c v2 which uses the non-cachable
>> > memory
>> > as the PCC shared memory.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@xxxxxxx>
>>
>> I can't tell if __force is justified here but I don't know much about
>> ACPI... Andy, can you have a look?
>
> Few comments to the patch as well.
>
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>> > +static const struct acpi_device_id xgene_slimpro_i2c_acpi_ids[] = {
>> > + {"APMC0D40", XGENE_SLIMPRO_I2C_V1},
>> > + {"APMC0D8B", XGENE_SLIMPRO_I2C_V2},
>> > + {}
>> > +};
>> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, xgene_slimpro_i2c_acpi_ids);
>> > +#endif
>
> No need to move this here...
>
>> > +
>> > static int xgene_slimpro_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> > {
>> > struct slimpro_i2c_dev *ctx;
>> > @@ -476,6 +490,17 @@ static int xgene_slimpro_i2c_probe(struct
>> > platform_device *pdev)
>> > }
>> > } else {
>> > struct acpi_pcct_hw_reduced *cppc_ss;
>> > + int version = XGENE_SLIMPRO_I2C_V1;
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>
> Do you really need this ifdef?
>
>> > + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
>> > +
>> > + acpi_id =
>> > acpi_match_device(xgene_slimpro_i2c_acpi_ids,
>
> ... you may get pointer to id table via pdev.
>
>> > + &pdev->dev);
>> > + if (!acpi_id)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > +
>> > + version = (int)acpi_id->driver_data;
>> > +#endif
>
>> > if (ctx->comm_base_addr) {
>> > - ctx->pcc_comm_addr = memremap(ctx-
>> > >comm_base_addr,
>> > - cppc_ss-
>> > >length,
>> > - MEMREMAP_WB);
>> > + if (version == XGENE_SLIMPRO_I2C_V2)
>> > + ctx->pcc_comm_addr = (void __force
>> > *)ioremap(
>> > + ctx-
>> > >comm_base_addr,
>> > + cppc_ss-
>> > >length);
>
> Commit message actually doesn't explain why we switch to iomap over
> memmap.
>
> (__force here is obviously to suppress __iomap annotation for mapped
> memory)
>
> If you need non-cacheable MEMREMAP_WT I guess will do a job.
Yes, I can switch to MEMREMAP_WT.
I'm going to send out another patch soon.
Thanks
Hoan
>
>> > + else
>> > + ctx->pcc_comm_addr = memremap(
>> > + ctx-
>> > >comm_base_addr,
>> > + cppc_ss-
>> > >length,
>> > + MEMREMAP_WB
>> > );
>
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Intel Finland Oy
