On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 3:28:22 PM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:
> The commit 8503ff166504 ("i2c: designware: Avoid unnecessary resuming
> during system suspend"), may suggest to the PM core to try out the so
> called direct_complete path for system sleep. In this path, the PM core
> treats a runtime suspended device as it's already in a proper low power
> state for system sleep, which makes it skip calling the system sleep
> callbacks for the device, except for the ->prepare() and the ->complete()
> callbacks.
>
> However, the PM core may unset the direct_complete flag for a parent
> device, in case its child device are being system suspended before. In this
> scenario, the PM core invokes the system sleep callbacks, no matter if the
> device is runtime suspended or not.
>
> Particularly in cases of an existing i2c slave device, the above path is
> triggered, which breaks the assumption that the i2c device is always
> runtime resumed whenever the dw_i2c_plat_suspend() is being called.
>
> More precisely, dw_i2c_plat_suspend() calls clk_core_disable() and
> clk_core_unprepare(), for an already disabled/unprepared clock, leading to
> a splat in the log about clocks calls being wrongly balanced and breaking
> system sleep.
>
> To still allow the direct_complete path in cases when it's possible, but
> also to keep the fix simple, let's runtime resume the i2c device in the
> ->suspend() callback, before continuing to put the device into low power
> state.
>
> Note, in cases when the i2c device is attached to the ACPI PM domain, this
> problem doesn't occur, because ACPI's ->suspend() callback, assigned to
> acpi_subsys_suspend(), already calls pm_runtime_resume() for the device.
>
> It should also be noted that this change does not fix commit 8503ff166504
> ("i2c: designware: Avoid unnecessary resuming during system suspend").
> Because for the non-ACPI case, the system sleep support was already broken
> prior that point.
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.4+
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Looks OK to me.
> ---
>
> I decided to post this as a separate change, instead of as earlier folding it
> in the series that extends the ACPI PM domain to cope with the runtime PM
> centric path for system sleep.
>
> This change applies on a fresh v4.4+. If someone wants it's applied for earlier
> version, please send a backport yourself.
>
> It's based on 4.13 rc4 and I assume it should go as a fix via the i2c tree.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Updated changelog.
> - Runtime resume the device in ->suspend() instead of in ->prepare().
>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 2ea6d0d..bb3b8c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static void dw_i2c_plat_complete(struct device *dev)
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> struct dw_i2c_dev *i_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> @@ -448,11 +448,21 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_resume(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int dw_i2c_plat_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_resume(dev);
> + return dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static const struct dev_pm_ops dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops = {
> .prepare = dw_i2c_plat_prepare,
> .complete = dw_i2c_plat_complete,
> SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume)
> - SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_suspend, dw_i2c_plat_resume, NULL)
> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(dw_i2c_plat_runtime_suspend,
> + dw_i2c_plat_resume,
> + NULL)
> };
>
> #define DW_I2C_DEV_PMOPS (&dw_i2c_dev_pm_ops)
>
