On Sun, 2016-06-19 at 19:30 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux- > > > i2c/list/?submitter=&state=&q=design&archive=&delegate= > > > > Wow, there is a couple from ancient times! > > We can skip the one from 2013 :) And I missed the ack for the 2015 > one, > will apply it now. I assume that Jarkko's patches we should review or comment, but I don't remember if it was the case that time. > > > > > > > > > I'd suggest I apply patches whenever they get acked- or rev-by > > > tags. > > > Or > > > drop them when someone says so in a reply to the patch. Does that > > > sound > > > like a plan? > > > > My patches can't be applied since it touches PCI part. > > I assume s/can't/can/ here and that True > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/610444/ > > is obsolete meanwhile then? Looks so wrt Jarkko's comment. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
