On 21/02/16 22:56, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> Hohum. Wolfram what do you think? > > I'd go for "EOPNOTSUPP" since it is most descriptive. I wouldn't say we > really need to fix it up in the kernel tree. However, I neither would > vote against it. > I'm certainly keen on cleaning this up in IIO at the least. A bit of consistency is always nice and once we have done it once it should be reasonably pain free. Anyhow, patches welcome ;) Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
