Re: [RFC] i2c_check_functionality and error code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Hohum. Wolfram what do you think?

I'd go for "EOPNOTSUPP" since it is most descriptive. I wouldn't say we
really need to fix it up in the kernel tree. However, I neither would
vote against it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux