On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:22:23 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 7 September 2015 at 10:50, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> > That sounds like good testing \o/ If you are happy with i2ctransfer, > >> > then please consider adding Tested-by tags to the i2ctransfer patches, > >> > so Jean gets a more cosy feeling to include them to i2ctools. > >> > > >> > >> Definitely! i2ctransfer was a HUGE help while developing this driver, > >> specially when preparing involved transfers to test repeated starts. > > > > Glad to hear that! I also discovered and fixed a corner case in repeated > > start handling recently in the i2c-rcar driver thanks to i2ctransfer. > > > >> Any chance it gets merged in its current state? I think it'll be useful, even > >> if the usage cli API is still a moving target. > > > > I don't think it is anymore TBH. Not more than any other tool. > > > > Waiving to Jean \o_ :) > > OK, let me wave as well \\O// Review in progress, will continue tomorrow. -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
