On 7 September 2015 at 10:50, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > That sounds like good testing \o/ If you are happy with i2ctransfer, >> > then please consider adding Tested-by tags to the i2ctransfer patches, >> > so Jean gets a more cosy feeling to include them to i2ctools. >> > >> >> Definitely! i2ctransfer was a HUGE help while developing this driver, >> specially when preparing involved transfers to test repeated starts. > > Glad to hear that! I also discovered and fixed a corner case in repeated > start handling recently in the i2c-rcar driver thanks to i2ctransfer. > >> Any chance it gets merged in its current state? I think it'll be useful, even >> if the usage cli API is still a moving target. > > I don't think it is anymore TBH. Not more than any other tool. > > Waiving to Jean \o_ :) > OK, let me wave as well \\O// -- Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur www.vanguardiasur.com.ar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
