On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Wolfram, > >> On Jun 10, 2015, at 17:08 , Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>> IIRC it is the one which adds OF_POPULATED. If so, why is this not >>>> scheduled for 4.1 as this bugfix depends on it? >>> >>> No idea. This is an obvious bugfix. >> >> Dunno if you did but mentioning after the commit message where you think >> it should be applied is very helpful for maintainers. >> >>> I would like to, yes. It’s just the nature of the process when dealing with >>> multiple kernel trees. I would be happy for someone to pick up and queue it >>> for 4.1. >> >> That might be too late now... You could also have sent the patch to me >> so that I could apply it via i2c with rob's ack. Next time... >> > > No worries. I’ve waited a couple of years until these things got in, I can wait > one more release cycle. You should know this already, but in the future for cross subsystem dependencies: - send the whole series together - Be clear if they are targeted for current rc and/or stable - suggest who you think should merge them: - for fixes, whomever took the offending commit if it is the same kernel cycle. - for dependencies, get ack's on the dependencies. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
