Hi Wolfram, > On Jun 10, 2015, at 17:08 , Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> IIRC it is the one which adds OF_POPULATED. If so, why is this not >>> scheduled for 4.1 as this bugfix depends on it? >> >> No idea. This is an obvious bugfix. > > Dunno if you did but mentioning after the commit message where you think > it should be applied is very helpful for maintainers. > >> I would like to, yes. It’s just the nature of the process when dealing with >> multiple kernel trees. I would be happy for someone to pick up and queue it >> for 4.1. > > That might be too late now... You could also have sent the patch to me > so that I could apply it via i2c with rob's ack. Next time... > No worries. I’ve waited a couple of years until these things got in, I can wait one more release cycle. Regards — Pantelis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html