On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > IIRC it is the one which adds OF_POPULATED. If so, why is this not >> > scheduled for 4.1 as this bugfix depends on it? >> >> No idea. This is an obvious bugfix. > > Dunno if you did but mentioning after the commit message where you think > it should be applied is very helpful for maintainers. +1 >> I would like to, yes. It’s just the nature of the process when dealing with >> multiple kernel trees. I would be happy for someone to pick up and queue it >> for 4.1. > > That might be too late now... You could also have sent the patch to me > so that I could apply it via i2c with rob's ack. Next time... That is exactly what I suggested on Jan 26 and Wolfram asked to resend with my ack. Pantelis sent it on Apr 24 (w/o my ack) and I applied it on May 29. Wolfram acked it, so I assumed you were not picking it up. It sat there for over a month, so it must not have been critical to apply for 4.1. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
