On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 12:36:28AM +0900, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6: > > No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can > apply that. However... > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #3.10 and later > > If not, Wolfram could you do it please? > > The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a > cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the > latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem. > > I was thinking the same so I have tried to cherry-pick the patch on a 3.10.79 and it didn't cause any conflicts so I thought it could be sent to stable as is. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
