Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: at91: add support to FIFOs and alternative command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> If you send a new version, could you add stable in Cc to patch 3/6:

No need to send a new version just because of an additional ack. I can
apply that. However...

> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #3.10 and later
> If not, Wolfram could you do it please?

The problem with 3/6 is that it seems to depend on 1/6 which is a
cleanup patch. If cleaning up is not essential for the bugfix, the
latter should be done first. To avoid exactly this problem.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux