On Wed, 20 May 2015 22:44:52 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 05:49:07PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 08:57:00PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > static struct parport_driver i2c_parport_driver = {
> > > - .name = "i2c-parport",
> > > - .attach = i2c_parport_attach,
> > > - .detach = i2c_parport_detach,
> > > + .name = "i2c-parport",
> > > + .match_port = i2c_parport_attach,
> > > + .detach = i2c_parport_detach,
> > > + .devmodel = true,
> >
> > Minor nit: I prefer to not use tabs but a single space after the struct
> > member names. Less hazzle in the future and still readable IMO.
>
> It was having space originally. I changed that into tab as it was
> looking good with them as aligned.
As the driver maintainer, I am fine with both unaligned or tab-aligned.
Space-aligned as I did originally was not a good idea, I admit.
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
