Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c-core: Fix typo in comment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here.

While technically true...

> When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset
> of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will
> search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series.

... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously
have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other
subsystems. This is fine, too.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux