> > I give in to the flag idea. I also noticed that we'd need another flag > > anyhow to mark 10 bit addresses. I am still thinking between using two > > address-cells in that case (clean seperation between address and flags) > > or to encode the flags as MSB in the current address (all busses will > > have same address-cells and child description, less code paths and no > > overhead in dtbs). > > Reading thru the thread, this seems good to me. I would go with adding > flags in the MSB of the reg cell rather than adding a cell. Thanks. I was leaning to the MSB idea, too, and am currently checking how the code would look like. Feels much better to do knowing that it is basically upstream compatible ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
