On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 08:20:47AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:25:08AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > > You do not need to mention the count of your older patches here. > > While technically true... > > > When you mentioned 11/11, it meant your current submission is a patchset > > of 11 patches. So when the maintainer decides to apply your patch he will > > search your remaining 10 patches because he needs to apply them in series. > > ... this doesn't matter much for such cleanup series. They obviously > have no dependency and I assume that the other patches are for other > subsystems. This is fine, too. yes, I also asssumed the same. But it turned out that he has sent 10/10 on 15th May, and then 11/11 , 12/12 , 13/13 and 14/14 on May 18th. So I assumed that it is a wrong setting while creating his patch. isn't it? regards sudip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
