> While thinking about it (and I still think of it as a 'big issue' > compared to the intention of the initial patch) I came to the > conclusion that I should maybe just go for a board-specific > i2c-mux-pinctrl node instead of adding it to the SoC dtsi. That will > also avoid doubled i2c busses on boards with just the default i2c > option. Ehrm, then please let me know what you decided on. If you chose the above road, then I don't need to think about the other questions :)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
