RE: [PATCH v8 1/2] i2c: imx: add DMA support for freescale i2c driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 3:55 PM
> To: Yuan Yao-B46683
> Cc: marex@xxxxxxx; LW@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mark.rutland@xxxxxxx; Duan
> Fugang-B38611; shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-i2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] i2c: imx: add DMA support for freescale i2c
> driver
> > -#include <linux/init.h>
> > -#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > -#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/completion.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> > +#include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> > +#include <linux/dmapool.h>
> >  #include <linux/errno.h>
> >  #include <linux/err.h>
> >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > -#include <linux/delay.h>
> >  #include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> > -#include <linux/sched.h>
> > -#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > -#include <linux/clk.h>
> > -#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_dma.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_data/i2c-imx.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/sched.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> 
> This is a seperate patch.

[Yuan Yao] 
Here I just adjust the order of the include file as alphabetical order.
If it looks strange I can only add the include files about DMA.

> 
> 
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2SR);
> > +		if (temp & I2SR_ICF)
> > +			break;
> > +		if (time_after(jiffies, orig_jiffies +
> > +				msecs_to_jiffies(IMX_I2C_DMA_TIMEOUT))) {
> > +			dev_dbg(dev, "<%s> Timeout\n", __func__);
> > +			return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > +		}
> > +		schedule();
> 
> That might have been asked before. Is there no interrupt for this?
> 

[Yuan Yao] No, there is no interrupt.
After DMA callback, I must wait until the last byte transfer completely.
It's a very short time which less than 10us.
By the way, how about use udelay(10) instead of schedule()?
udelay(10) is waiting a appropriate time.
schedule() is waiting too long for i2c but may be good for whole system.
Can you give me some suggestion?

Thanks for your review.

Best Regards,
Yuan Yao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux