Addy, On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:50 PM, Addy Ke <addy.ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > As show in I2C specification: > - Standard-mode: the minimum HIGH period of the scl clock is 4.0us > the minimum LOW period of the scl clock is 4.7us > - Fast-mode: the minimum HIGH period of the scl clock is 0.6us > the minimum LOW period of the scl clock is 1.3us > > I have measured i2c SCL waveforms in fast-mode by oscilloscope > on rk3288-pinky board. the LOW period of the scl clock is 1.3us. > It is so critical that we must adjust LOW division to increase > the LOW period of the scl clock. > > Thanks Doug for the suggestion about division formulas. > > Signed-off-by: Addy Ke <addy.ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > - remove Fast-mode plus and HS-mode > - use new formulas suggested by Doug > Changes in V3: > - use new formulas (sep 30) suggested by Doug > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c > index b41d979..9612eba 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rk3x.c > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ > #include <linux/wait.h> > #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h> > #include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/math64.h> > > > /* Register Map */ > @@ -428,18 +429,138 @@ out: > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > +static void rk3x_i2c_calc_divs(unsigned long i2c_rate, unsigned long scl_rate, > + unsigned long *div_low, unsigned long *div_high) > +{ > + unsigned long min_low_ns, min_high_ns; > + unsigned long max_data_hold_ns; > + unsigned long data_hold_buffer_ns; > + unsigned long max_low_ns, min_total_ns; > + > + unsigned long i2c_rate_khz, scl_rate_khz; > + > + unsigned long min_low_div, min_high_div; > + unsigned long max_low_div; > + > + unsigned long min_div_for_hold, min_total_div; > + unsigned long extra_div, extra_low_div, ideal_low_div; > + > + /* Only support standard-mode and fast-mode */ > + WARN_ON(scl_rate > 400000); > + > + /* > + * min_low_ns: The minimum number of ns we need to hold low > + * to meet i2c spec > + * min_high_ns: The minimum number of ns we need to hold high > + * to meet i2c spec > + * max_low_ns: The maximum number of ns we can hold low > + * to meet i2c spec > + * > + * Note: max_low_ns should be (max data hold time * 2 - buffer) > + * This is because the i2c host on Rockchip holds the data line > + * for half the low time. > + */ > + if (scl_rate <= 100000) { > + min_low_ns = 4700; > + min_high_ns = 4000; > + max_data_hold_ns = 3450; > + data_hold_buffer_ns = 50; > + } else { > + min_low_ns = 1300; > + min_high_ns = 600; > + max_data_hold_ns = 900; > + data_hold_buffer_ns = 50; > + } > + max_low_ns = max_data_hold_ns * 2 - data_hold_buffer_ns; > + min_total_ns = min_low_ns + min_high_ns; > + > + /* Adjust to avoid overflow */ > + i2c_rate_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate, 1000); > + scl_rate_khz = DIV_ROUND_UP(scl_rate, 1000); > + > + /* > + * We need the total div to be >= this number > + * so we don't clock too fast. > + */ > + min_total_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate_khz, scl_rate_khz * 8); > + > + /* These are the min dividers needed for min hold times.*/ nit: a space before the "*" in the comment. > + min_low_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate_khz * min_low_ns, 8 * 1000000); > + min_high_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate_khz * min_high_ns, 8 * 1000000); > + min_div_for_hold = (min_low_div + min_high_div); > + > + /* > + * This is the maximum divider so we don't go over the max. > + * We don't round up here (we round down) since this is a max. > + */ > + max_low_div = i2c_rate_khz * max_low_ns / (8 * 1000000); > + > + if (min_low_div > max_low_div) It feels like we should print some sort of warning here. Maybe WARN_ONCE? > + max_low_div = min_low_div; > + > + if (min_div_for_hold > min_total_div) { > + /* > + * Time needed to meet hold requirements is important. > + * Just use that. > + */ > + *div_low = min_low_div; > + *div_high = min_high_div; > + } else { > + /* > + * We've got to distribute some time among the low and high > + * so we don't run too fast. > + */ > + extra_div = min_total_div - min_div_for_hold; > + /* > + * We'll try to split things up perfectly evenly, > + * biasing slightly towards having a higher div > + * for low (spend more time low). > + */ > + nit: The comment above should probably be next to the line below, not to the line above it. > + ideal_low_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate_khz * min_low_ns, > + scl_rate_khz * 8 * min_total_ns); > + > + /* Don't allow it to go over the max */ > + if (ideal_low_div > max_low_div) > + ideal_low_div = max_low_div; > + > + /* Handle when the ideal low div is going to take up > + * more than we have. > + */ nit: above comment had the wrong style still > + if (ideal_low_div > min_low_div + extra_div) > + ideal_low_div = min_low_div + extra_div; > + > + /* Give low the "ideal" and give high whatever extra is left */ > + extra_low_div = ideal_low_div - min_low_div; > + *div_low = ideal_low_div; > + *div_high = min_high_div + (extra_div - extra_low_div); > + } > + > + /* > + * Adjust to the fact that the hardware has an implicit "+1". > + * NOTE: Above calculations always produce div_low > 0 and div_high > 0. > + */ > + *div_low = *div_low - 1; > + *div_high = *div_high - 1; > +} > + > static void rk3x_i2c_set_scl_rate(struct rk3x_i2c *i2c, unsigned long scl_rate) > { > unsigned long i2c_rate = clk_get_rate(i2c->clk); > - unsigned int div; > + unsigned long div_low, div_high; > + u64 t_low_ns, t_high_ns; > > - /* set DIV = DIVH = DIVL > - * SCL rate = (clk rate) / (8 * (DIVH + 1 + DIVL + 1)) > - * = (clk rate) / (16 * (DIV + 1)) > - */ > - div = DIV_ROUND_UP(i2c_rate, scl_rate * 16) - 1; > + rk3x_i2c_calc_divs(i2c_rate, scl_rate, &div_low, &div_high); > + > + i2c_writel(i2c, (div_high << 16) | (div_low & 0xffff), REG_CLKDIV); > > - i2c_writel(i2c, (div << 16) | (div & 0xffff), REG_CLKDIV); > + t_low_ns = div_u64(((u64)div_low + 1) * 8 * 1000000000, i2c_rate); > + t_high_ns = div_u64(((u64)div_high + 1) * 8 * 1000000000, i2c_rate); > + dev_dbg(i2c->dev, > + "CLK %lukhz, Req %luns, Act low %lluns high %lluns\n", > + i2c_rate / 1000, > + 1000000000 / scl_rate, > + t_low_ns, t_high_ns); > } > > /** All of my comments are just nits and this appears to match the python script I sent out exactly. I guess that means you're happy with these formulas now. :) Hopefully others (Max, Wolfram?) can take a look at this now and see what they think. It's definitely long but I think it should give us the best numbers we can get (and most of the length is all the comments). Maybe you can send up a v4 that addresses nits? After nits: Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> I've tested this on my rk3288 board and i2c still seems to work fine at 400kHz. I haven't scoped it myself, but I trust that you have. Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html