Hello Dmitry, On 08/25/2014 07:05 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> >> Patches #1, #2, #6 and #7 do not depend of others so they can be >> merged independently but patches #3, #4 and #5 have to be merged >> in that specific order since they depend on the previous one. > > #7 does not apply to my tree (I guess it depends on the 1st batch which I > expect will go through MFD tree?). Maybe you could rebase it on top of my next > so it can be applied sooner? Or it really needs parts of patchset #1? > The first batch sent by Doug did indeed touch this driver and the patches were merged through the MFD tree for 3.17 as you said. I see that your next branch is based on 3.16-rc6 and that is why it does not apply cleanly. I guess you will rebase your next branch for 3.18 on top of 3.17-rc1 anyways which will fix this issue? If not please let me know and I can of course re-spin the patch so it applies cleanly on top of 3.16-rc6. > Thanks. > Best regards, Javier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
