On Thu Jan 23 19:15, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Well, it is not the Copyrights section, or you are saying the same > > people should go to MODULE_AUTHOR as in the Copyrights section, even > > if it is potentially several names? I thought this would be the name > > of the person who put the file together even if from existing sources. > > You may be right that the two can be viewed differently. Nonetheless, > adding 10 lines to an existing driver already upstream does not count > for both. Apologies for the confusion resulting from a using a lot of context in my patch. My small changes does not warrant changing any copyright or author notices in this file. > > > >> PS.: Fixing the broken i2c mailing list typo, and updating Wolfram's > > >> address from the broken (obsolete?) version. > > > > > > It came through to the i2c list? What was wrong? > > > > Yes, it did, _after_ fixing the typo in the mailing list address. > > Check the original mailing list address typed for details. > > I did. That's why I asked :) Plus, since I got the original mail, it > must have come via i2c-list since my pengutronix address was in deed > wrong. Again apologies: Indeed I had the i2c-list mailing address wrong on my initial submission, which Laszlo fixed up and resent. I will be submitting a new version of the patch set that: 1. reduces the context lines 2. clarifies a few points in the commit message Cheers, Curt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
