Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add at24 based EEPROMs to the eeprom_dev hardware class

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

No need to quote the whole message if you reply only to a bit of it.

> >  module_init(at24_init);
> >
> >  static void __exit at24_exit(void)
> >  {
> >         i2c_del_driver(&at24_driver);
> >  }
> >  module_exit(at24_exit);
> 
> Couldn't you use module_i2c_driver() instead of this?

He didn't write that code. It doesn't have a + at the beginning. He used
the whole driver as context, which is highly unusual. A context of 3
lines is usually good enough.

> 
> >  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Driver for most I2C EEPROMs");
> >  MODULE_AUTHOR("David Brownell and Wolfram Sang");
> 
> I would personally put your name in here if I were you, otherwise
> David and Wolfram might get contacted by some people instead of you
> (at least based on this).

See above. He changed only 10 lines. Not enough for copyright IMO.

> PS.: Fixing the broken i2c mailing list typo, and updating Wolfram's
> address from the broken (obsolete?) version.

It came through to the i2c list? What was wrong?

Regards,

   Wolfram

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux