Re: [PATCH] dt: Update I2C trivial devices list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 01/13/2014 07:25 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> What about putting this into a seperate paragraph prefixed with "Current
>>> Linux specific implementation:"?
>>>
>> This would address my concern quite nicely.
>
> The text should go into Documentation/ not the DT binding.
>
The problem here is that as it stands DT is quite daunting to pick
up. My needs are pretty minimal yet I had to spend many hours sifting
through source, blogs, and Documentation/* to get something that more or
less worked. The bindings are generally well-documented, but there is no
"start here" document in the tree giving conventions and an overview of
how Linux in particular uses DT.

The closest thing I know of is Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt.
Perhaps this is where the language Wolfram suggested should be placed.

Cheers,

- Ben

Attachment: pgp2JlqVWK0kL.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux