Re: [PATCH] dt: Update I2C trivial devices list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:26:47PM -0500, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On 01/13/2014 07:25 AM, Ben Gamari wrote:
> >> Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> >>> What about putting this into a seperate paragraph prefixed with "Current
> >>> Linux specific implementation:"?
> >>>
> >> This would address my concern quite nicely.
> >
> > The text should go into Documentation/ not the DT binding.
> >
> The problem here is that as it stands DT is quite daunting to pick
> up. My needs are pretty minimal yet I had to spend many hours sifting
> through source, blogs, and Documentation/* to get something that more or
> less worked. The bindings are generally well-documented, but there is no
> "start here" document in the tree giving conventions and an overview of
> how Linux in particular uses DT.
> 
> The closest thing I know of is Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt.
> Perhaps this is where the language Wolfram suggested should be placed.

I appreciate your effort to improve documentation on how to get started.
Sadly, I don't know where the best place would be and I am too busy to
look it up. If you are interested, I'll happily apply the outcome,
otherwise we sadly have to wait until someone else comes up.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux