On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 02:09:59PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:14:18PM -0800, Benson Leung wrote: > > Hi Wolfram, > > > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> In the chromeos_laptop driver, I do by-name matching of i2c busses to > > >> find busses and instantiate devices, so there is value to have each > > >> named something predictable. > > > > > > Any why don't you use fixed bus numbers which you can attach the devices > > > to? > > > > On this particular set of systems, there are two other classes of i2c > > adapters that use dynamically assigned bus numbers, specifically the > > i915 gmbus adapters, and the i801_smbus adapter. This is why > > chromeos_laptop uses the name matching, as some of the boards that it > > supports have devices on those dynamic busses. > > I am not sure I get the problem. If you use i2c_register_board_info() to > register the known devices on the designware busses the dynamically > assigned numbers are guaranteed to be enumarated higer than the static > ones. Check drivers/i2c/i2c-boardinfo.c. Ping. Was this helpful or do you still have the issue?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
