On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 08:26:50PM -0700, Benson Leung wrote: > Rather than having the bus names be "i2c-designware-pci--1" because > we have set the .bus_num to -1 to force dynamic allocation, lets have > the busses named "i2c-designware-pci-0" and "i2c-designware-pci-1" > to correspond to the correct names of these busses. > > The adapter number will still be dynamically assigned. Is there any real value in having names like "i2c-designware-pci-0" available? I would just drop the whole naming dance instead... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
