On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello. > > On 18-12-2013 17:49, Simon Horman wrote: > >>>>>>> @@ -173,6 +179,10 @@ static struct clk_lookup lookups[] = { >>>>>>> CLKDEV_CON_ID("mtu2_fck", &mstp_clks[MSTP33]), > > >>>>>>> /* ICK */ >>>>>>> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee000.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP97]), >>>>>>> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee400.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP96]), >>>>>>> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfee800.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP95]), >>>>>>> + CLKDEV_DEV_ID("fcfeec00.i2c", &mstp_clks[MSTP94]), > > >>>>>> These belong to some other place, the group marked by /* ICK */ >>>>>> is only for CLKDEV_ICK_ID(). > > >>>>> So, I'll create a /* DEV */ prefix? > > >>>> I really don't know. Other places have /* MSTP */ comment in this >>>> case despite all clocks, CLKDEV_DEV_ID() and CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are >>>> really MSTP clocks. I considered the idea of separating >>>> CLKDEV_ICK_ID() under /* ICK */ comment silly from the very start >>>> but Simon didn't listen to me. > > >>> I am puzzled, too. ICK is a type of registration and not a clock domain. >>> Also, there is 'mtu2_fck' which is under ICK as well as MSTP? Looks >>> wrong. From what I understand now, removing the /* ICK */ comment would >>> be easiest and proper? > > >> I'm not sure that I really understand what all the fuss is about. > > >> As I understand things the convention that prevails for >> MSTP clocks under mach-shmobile is as follows: > > >> 1. Clocks not registered by CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are grouped together >> under /* MSTP */ followed by: >> 2. Clocks registered using CLKDEV_ICK_ID() are grouped together >> under /* ICK */ > > >> I am unsure of the historical reason for this > > > Recent patches by Morimoto-san. > > >> but it does seem to be consistent. > > > No, it doesn't. These comments are *clearly* not consistent and should be > removed at least. Feel free to contribute patches! / magnus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html