Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] I2C and SPI dev_name change for ACPI enumerated slaves

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday, November 01, 2013 03:44:38 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/01/2013 03:20 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:18:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> Looks good to me.  If there are no objections, I can merge these through my tree.
> > Which is basically fine with me. Do you want to have it in 3.13 already?
> > I mean renaming the devices could lead to regressions, so I'd rather be
> > conservative and aim for 3.14.
> >
> Valid concern. Quick grep below doesn't reveal any obvious device name 
> matching outside of sound/soc/ but of course it doesn't prove it to be 
> impossible.
> 
> git grep '[0-9]\-00' |grep name
> git grep 'spi[0-9].[0-9]' |grep name

Well, if any breakage is caught in 3.13-rc, it should be easy enough to revert
these changes and try again during the next cycle.  I honestly don't see any
benefit from waiting for the next cycle "just in case".

Thanks!

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux