On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:18:06PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, November 01, 2013 02:35:53 PM Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > Hi > > > > Second version of the set that changes I2C and SPI slave device names > > to be generated from stable ACPI device names on ACPI 5 based systems > > instead of using bus numbers which could change. > > > > Slave device name change goes as > > > > "x-00yz" -> "i2c-INTABCD:ij" > > "spix.y" -> "spi-INTABCD:ij" > > > > This version adds patch to include/acpi/acpi_bus.h that allow us to > > remove #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI) checks that were added in the > > first version. > > > > Set goes on top linux-pm/linux-next commit e56b4d2. > > > > First version here: > > http://mailman.alsa-project.org/pipermail/alsa-devel/2013-October/067737.html > > > > Jarkko Nikula (3): > > ACPI: Expose struct acpi_device and acpi_bus_get_device() to non-ACPI > > builds > > i2c: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated I2C slaves > > spi: Use stable dev_name for ACPI enumerated SPI slaves > > > > drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++---- > > drivers/spi/spi.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++--- > > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 9 +++++++-- > > 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > Looks good to me. If there are no objections, I can merge these through my tree. Which is basically fine with me. Do you want to have it in 3.13 already? I mean renaming the devices could lead to regressions, so I'd rather be conservative and aim for 3.14.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
