On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 02:16:28PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:17:45PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:06:47AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > This commit adds support for probing slave devices parsed from the > > > > device tree. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > How are the devicetree nodes of the slaves connected to this PCI device > > > which should not have a node itself? > > > > The matching is done by pci_set_of_node() and pci_set_bus_of_node(). > > The latter will eventually call pcibios_get_phb_of_node(). What makes > > you say that PCI devices shouldn't have nodes themselves? > > I thought to recall that busses which can be probed at runtime should > not have nodes but should be probed. Maybe that was wrong. Can you point > me to a dts-file with an example? That approach doesn't work for I2C controllers, though because you couldn't attach an slaves to them. The same goes for SPI controllers or any other dumb busses that can't be probed. arch/x86/platform/ce4100/falconfalls.dts is an example for an X86 platform where PCI devices have associated device tree nodes. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpOZmmSmpM6m.pgp
Description: PGP signature
