On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 01:17:45PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:48:46AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:06:47AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > This commit adds support for probing slave devices parsed from the > > > device tree. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > How are the devicetree nodes of the slaves connected to this PCI device > > which should not have a node itself? > > The matching is done by pci_set_of_node() and pci_set_bus_of_node(). > The latter will eventually call pcibios_get_phb_of_node(). What makes > you say that PCI devices shouldn't have nodes themselves? I thought to recall that busses which can be probed at runtime should not have nodes but should be probed. Maybe that was wrong. Can you point me to a dts-file with an example? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
