Re: State of arbitration and i2c_gpio?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Jean Delvare:
> > They'll certainly notice that the first time they lose arbitration.
> 
> They won't notice if the code is disabled. My point was that we don't
> want to put an additional burden on single-master buses because
> arbitration is never needed for them.
> 
Checking whether Data is High after setting Clock to High is not something
I'd call a burden ...

-- 
-- Matthias Urlichs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux