On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi all, > > As per > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4 > > the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM > handling based on struct dev_pm_ops: > > [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no > objections. The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though, since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd be in linux-next tomorrow. Or is there a dependency I missed? Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
