On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > As per > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4 > > > > the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM > > handling based on struct dev_pm_ops: > > > > [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management > > > > I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no > > objections. > > The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though, > since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in > the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd > be in linux-next tomorrow. Cool, thanks for handling them! :-) > Or is there a dependency I missed? No, there shouldn't be any. Thanks, Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
